The FTC has no evidence establishing that Meta’s conduct was “exclusionary” – which is defined as conduct that actually caused harm to competition and consumers.Our acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp are good for consumers and businesses. The agency’s amended complaint was allowed to proceed based on its promise to provide evidence that would support its claims of alleged harm to competition and consumers caused by Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp the existence of a “personal social networking services” (PSNS) antitrust market and Meta’s alleged monopoly power in that market.Īfter more than a year of pre-complaint investigation and two years of extensive litigation discovery, it is more apparent than ever that the FTC cannot prove any of these claims. The FTC’s initial complaint was dismissed in its entirety for failure to state a plausible claim. We Compete Fairly and Face Strong Competition Our motion, which we outline below, asks the court to award Meta summary judgment and dismiss the FTC’s lawsuit. Through billions of dollars and millions of hours of investment, we’ve made the apps better, more reliable, and more secure. Further, Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, which regulators reviewed and cleared more than a decade ago, have benefited consumers.

The evidence shows exactly what we said it would: Meta faces fierce competition from a range of platforms – from TikTok and X to YouTube and Snapchat. From the very beginning, the FTC has failed to state a plausible claim, and the agency has done nothing to build its case through the discovery process to prove otherwise. Today, we filed a motion for summary judgment, asking the District Court to dismiss the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) effort to unwind the decade-plus acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.

Metaverser free instals